Douglas N. Husaks A Moral Right to Use Drugs Essay -- Husak Moral Rig

Douglas N. Husaks A Moral Right to Use Drugs In Douglas N. Husaks A Moral Right to Use Drugs he attempts to look at medicate ingestion from an impartial standpoint in order to determine what is the best legal status for currently illegal drugs. Husak first describes the current legal incident concerning drugs in America, citing figures that show how drug crimes now make up a large percentage of crimes in our country. Husak explains the disruption which this ca enforces within the judicial system and it is make clear that he is not content with the current way drugs be treated. The figures that Husak offers up, much(prenominal) as the fact that up to one third of all felony charges view drugs, are startling, but more evidence is needed than the fact that a law is frequently broken to justify its repeal. Husak attempts to discuss drug mathematical function legality aside in order to prove his argument. He looks at drug use in a three fold manner exploring t he reasons Americans use drugs, the justifications behind the war on drugs, and a discussion on which drugs, if any, should be affected by the law. In understanding Husaks beliefs on the reasons for drug use it is first important to look at his definition for recreational use verses drug abuse. Husak defines recreational use as either consumption for enhancement of an experience, such as at a concert, or for alleviation from boredom, like while doing household chores. Husak admits that there are gray areas between this recreational approach and the universally reviled drug abuse. However, Husak is right in saying that drug use that occurs in the ghetto is not recreational, and goes on to explain that rich white people are even off more likely to use certain drugs, notably ... ...enough time explaining the benefits of legalization. I agree with his assertion that the burden of proof should lie on the heads of those limiting our freedoms and thusly I personally am not bot hered by his attack strategy, but in the grand scheme of trying to further his cause Husak would be served well by discussing the issue in terms of why legalization would help our society. I respect this piece a lot and what I would sincerely like to see is some of Husaks ideas form implementation, such as educational programs. This article does a lot to tear down the old beliefs that are hurting our society, which is an important first step. Yet, those of us who favor change must remember that removing old views does not bring freedom, it leaves a gap. Freedom is attained when we convert that gap with a morally and legally sound new set of ideals and rules.

Essay on William Shakespeares Fools -- Biography Biographies Essays

Shakespeares Fools Shakespeare subroutined foolish characters in his plays to make points that he considers highly important. I had previously supposed that Shakespeare was an entertainer who sprinkled his writing with observations approximately humanity and its place in the world to please critics. However, I discovered that he was a gifted writer who had a penetrating understanding the precondition of humanity in the world and sprinkled his plays with fools and jokes meant for the common man as a way of conceding to his audiences intellectual level. Or, as Walter Kaufmann said in his essay Shakespeare among Socrates and Existentialism, Shakespeare came to terms with the obtuseness of his public he gave his pearls a slight odor of the sty before he cast them. Kaufmann continues his essay by saying that Shakespeare, foreign many modern artists, turned the challenge of a boorish, lecherous, and vulgar audience to advantage and increased the richness and the subtlety of drama. (Kaufmann 3) Perhaps the best example of Shakespeares use of the fool (and certainly the best in any Shakespearean play that I have read) is Falstaff in I Henry IV. In The Fortunes of Falstaff, Wilson claims that Falstaff is the embodiment of the ungodliness of Vanity he is cowardly in battle, proud and pretentious, dishonest, conniving, lacks respect for the property of others, and is concerned only with wine, tavern wenches, and comfort. It would be easy for a reader (or play-watcher) unfamiliar with Shakespeare to conclude, in our own time, that Falstaff has been included in the drama solely to provide entertainment value. However, Falstaff is also essential to the play in many ways. He is requisite in the development of Prince Hal, ... ...han I first supposed. Rather than being mere device for the entertainment of his audience, Bottom and Falstaff (and many of his other characters) are used, in these cases to origin the other characters of his plays, to make important po ints that Shakespeare wishes his audience to understand. They are integral parts of Shakespeares drama. References Kaufmann, Walter. Shakespeare Between Socrates and Existentialism in From Shakespeare to Existentialism. Princeton Princeton University Press, 1980. Shakespeare, William. The Comedy of Errors. stark naked York Penguin, 1965. Shakespeare, William. Henry IV, Part I. New York Penguin, 1965. Shakespeare, William. A Midsummer Nights Dream. New York Penguin, 1965. Wilson, John Dover. From The Fortunes of Falstaff in Shakespeares Henry IV, Part I. Ed. Maynard Mack. New York Penguin, 1965.

Group Dynamics Essay -- essays research papers

The characteristics of effective GroupsMuch can be learned about the art of building an effective group. We now understand many of the principles that pee-pee the proper environment in which groups can blossom and flourish. Yet we remain unable to "guarantee" that any given group will reach its goals or be anything more than modestly successful. However, even a group composed of "the very best people" has some probability of failure.( )Groups can take on so much more risk than individuals and can attempt a level of greatness that is beyond the realistic hope of any individual. To unleash the sound power of groups, members need to sort out for themselves where and how they can best make use of their group and what, for them, group endure means. Below be characteristics of effective Groups. short PurposeThe group members must agree on a clear purpose or goal and each team member is willing to work to achieve these goals. The team is aware of and interested in its o wn processes and examines norms operating within the team. The team identifies its own resources and uses them, depending on its needs. The team willingly accepts the influence and leading of the members whose resources are relevant to the immediate task.ListeningThe team members continually listen to and clarify what is being said and show interest in others thoughts and feelings. Differences of opinion are encouraged and freely expressed. The team does not demand narrow conformity or ...